In Illinois v. Wardlow, the Supreme Court endorsed police stop and frisk.

In Illinois v. Wardlow the Supreme Court endorsed police stop and frisk.

The court held that relying solely on Wardlow fleeing would have been invalid and the evidence seized would have been inadmissible. But the police pointed to the fact that their search of Wardlow occurred in a high-crime area and that was good enough for the Supreme Court. Studies have shown there are more hot spots as opposed to whole areas in the community. What are your thoughts even as you look at your own communities? Has the term high-crime area become a wild card for increased police use of stop and frisk? 2 paragraphs Welcome to LSK

1 thought on “In Illinois v. Wardlow, the Supreme Court endorsed police stop and frisk.

    • […] She estimates a possible increase of $25 000 in net revenue as a result of increased business brought about by this change to the neighborhood. However there is also a chance of decreased demand for services should the bylaws of the owners association prohibit pets particularly coupled with existing competition from grooming services offered by large retail chain stores such as PetSmart. She projects a possible loss of $11 000 off last years net revenue. Data show that 75% of regional associations allow pets; whereby the other 25% are pet-free communities. Adriana believes that if she does not hire the part-time worker her business would generate the same revenue as the prior year. Do you think Adriana should hire a groomer? Support your objective advice using quantitative data analysis by applying probability theory relative to the estimated value of hiring the new groomer. Your explanation should include (1) a decision tree diagram (using Excel) to assist in evaluating Adrianas dilemma; and (2) a recommendation of a course of action which explicitly explains why Adriana should take your counsel. Identify uncertainty and risk and use the decision tree diagram and any numerical data to back up your position.MO3.1 MO3.2Your initial posting should be to 300 words. Before posting revise your composition to ensure that it is written in the objective third person and is free of grammar and structure errors. As this activity is a dialog exercise engage peers by responding in a way that professionally supports or challenges the discourse. Once the due date of the forum is past your contributions are still welcome; however they will not be considered by your mentor in determining your forum grade.… […]

Comments are closed.